Caption

What does confidence actually sound like? That’s a harder question than it seems. Linguist Deborah Tannen has spent decades studying how conversational styles can shape what happens at work—who gets heard, who gets credit, who is perceived as confident, and ultimately who gets ahead. One story she tells comes from a promotion meeting at a large multinational company. Senior managers reviewed employees they thought should be promoted. There were women in every group, but not one woman was recommended. The explanation that kept coming up was that the women didn’t seem to have enough self-confidence. But Tannen raised a different possibility: what if some of what managers were interpreting as a lack of confidence was actually a difference in communication style? Take something as simple as saying, “I’m sorry.” Sometimes “I’m sorry” means, “I did something wrong.” But sometimes it means, “I’m sorry that happened to you.” If one person intends the second meaning and another hears the first, an expression of empathy can suddenly sound like an admission of fault. Or think about certainty. Someone might say, “I’m pretty confident this is the right approach.” Someone else might say, “I think this could be the right approach, but I’d love to hear what everyone else thinks.” The second person isn’t necessarily less knowledgeable. But if an organization uses displays of certainty as a shortcut for competence, the two speakers may be evaluated very differently. The same problem can happen with questions. Asking for advice, feedback, or clarification can be interpreted as collaboration and curiosity. But in an environment where people associate expertise with already having the answer, it can also be interpreted as a lack of knowledge. And then there’s credit. “I accomplished this” and “we accomplished this” can describe the same project while creating very different impressions about who was responsible for its success. Tannen argued that these patterns can create a particular problem for women. Communicate in ways that are perceived as collaborative, tentative, or relationship-oriented, and you may be liked but underestimated. Communicate in a highly assertive, self-promoting way, and you may demonstrate competence but risk being judged as too aggressive. That’s the double bind. Of course, none of this means every woman communicates one way and every man communicates another. Gender is not a script, and communication style varies enormously within groups. Culture, personality, status, profession, age, organizational norms, and context all matter too. But the larger lesson still matters decades after Tannen’s original work: Before deciding that someone lacks confidence, leadership, or competence, ask whether you’re actually evaluating their ability—or simply how closely their communication style matches what you’ve learned to associate with ability. Sometimes the person who sounds the most confident isn’t the person who knows the most. They’re just the person whose confidence is easiest for us to hear. Have you noticed this at work? #Workplace #communication #sexism #language #linguistics