Loading…
Views
13,600
Likes
816
Comments
59
Shares
30
Duration
114s
VPF 2.5762
Caption
You know your Myers-Briggs type. Maybe you’re an INTJ. ENFP. INFJ. ESTP. But how much can those four letters actually tell you about your personality? The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator has become incredibly popular in workplaces, classrooms, career development, and—let’s be real—the internet. And part of the appeal makes sense. Personality frameworks give us language for understanding ourselves. Getting a result that feels accurate can make certain tendencies suddenly click. But in personality psychology research, there’s another framework you’ll encounter constantly: The Big Five. Instead of assigning you to one of 16 personality “types,” the Big Five measures you along five continuous dimensions: Openness Conscientiousness Extraversion Agreeableness Neuroticism And when researchers have compared Myers-Briggs dimensions with Big Five personality traits, some interesting similarities emerge. Extraversion on the MBTI, unsurprisingly, has substantial overlap with Big Five Extraversion. The MBTI’s Sensing–Intuition dimension also relates strongly to Big Five Openness. But there’s a particularly important difference. The MBTI doesn’t have a direct equivalent for Neuroticism. Neuroticism describes individual differences in tendencies toward negative emotionality—including things like anxiety, worry and emotional instability. That means two people could receive the same four-letter Myers-Briggs type while differing considerably on a major personality dimension captured by the Big Five. And that’s a good reminder of something important about personality tests: A useful framework isn’t necessarily a complete picture of who you are. If you’ve gotten something valuable from knowing your Myers-Briggs type, you don’t necessarily have to throw those four letters away. But try taking a reputable Big Five personality assessment too. You may recognize some of the same patterns. And you might learn something those four letters never told you. What’s your Myers-Briggs type—and do you think it actually describes you? #MyersBriggs #Personality #psychologyfacts #MBTI #personalitytest
Transcript
My guess is that you've probably taken the Myers-Briggs test for personality. Maybe you did it at a job. Make sense? Maybe you did it for fun. Maybe you took psych 101 class. or my area, organizational behavior. Maybe you're one of my students and you took it as well. You got your four letters, your ENFP or whatever it might be. You thought, “man, that's kinda me. I get. I get that. That makes sense.” so here's what almost no one knows. Psychologists compared the Myers-briggs directly against the test that researchers actually trust. So the Myers-briggs is not really a psychologically verified test. Myers-briggs, by the way, is a for profit company. The psychological test that researchers have validated in hundreds, maybe even thousands of studies is called the Big Five. And they found something really interesting when they paired the two together. So researchers gave tests, These two tests, the Myers-briggs and the Big five, to a group of managers. They line the results up side by side, and much of it matched exactly as you might expect. So extraversion, by the way, one test was the same pretty much as extraversion on the other. Another example was openness to new ideas, which is one of the dimensions of the Big Five. Lined up pretty closely with the intuition score on the Myers-briggs. Okay, make sense. But there is One entire trait from the Big five that is not on the Myers-briggs at all, and that is really critical to understand. And that is neuroticism, meaning how prone someone is to stress, anxiety, and emotional UPS and downs. In fact, this is one of the critical building blocks of personality that doesn't exist at all in the Myers-briggs. and this matters a lot if you think about it. Think about two people who score identically in the Myers Briggs. Same four letters, same type. You know, they could have completely different emotional temperaments. Neuroticism, right. one might handle pressure calmly. one might be constantly on edge, and the test just doesn't capture that. Different. So This research study doesn't say the Myers-briggs is irrelevant or worthless. It's actually a lot of overlap between the most validated test except for that element of neuroticism. So my tip to you, if you have taken Myers Briggs, take the big five as well. I think you'll be really interested. I think that you'll probably find some alignment on the test, but you also will get that critical neuroticism score.
Hook analysis
brand_fit: no“My guess is that you've probably taken the Myers-Briggs test for personality.”
Pattern
contrarian_inversion
Format
—
Topic
—
Sub-topic
Myers-Briggs vs Big Five validity
Content angle
the personality test you trust is missing the trait that matters most
CTA
Take the Big Five test in addition to Myers-Briggs
Narrative structure
shared experience -> 'almost no one knows' reveal -> study comparison -> the one missing variable -> tip
AU transplant
with_changes
Transplant note
The shape carries cleanly: name a framework the audience already accepts, show what it leaves out, hand over the better instrument. Nothing here is US-legal or US-salary specific — MBTI and Big Five are equally known in Australian workplaces and universities. To transplant, the payload would have to change from psychometrics to something Ark actually owns: e.g. 'you know you're a data analyst — that label hides the sub-role, and the sub-role is what decides whether you get hired.' The 'one entire dimension is missing from the test' move maps directly onto subdivision teaching.
Brand fit note
Off-business: Generic personality test comparison with no Australian market or employment specificity. A US coach could publish unchanged.
Why it performed
Not written yet.