Transplant note

The structure is a copy-paste asset with numbered rules and a defined output (score out of 10, what was missing, skeptical follow-up) — that transfers cleanly. Nothing in it is US/Canada-specific: no visa, no salary band, no job board. To make it Ark's, the rules would need Australian hiring reality baked in: STAR-format behavioural questions as Australian panels run them, pushback on overseas-experience answers ('how does that translate here?'), and the local-experience objection as a mandated question. Add Australian salary bands if the prompt is extended to the offer conversation.

Brand fit note

No Never-ships trip — it asks for rehearsal, not fabrication, and in fact rule 4 ('push back if my answer is vague or has no measurable results') is close to the voice's cost-accounting instinct. But as written a US or Canadian coach could publish it unchanged, which the relevance test says disqualifies it as ours. It is also pure tool, no mechanism and no numbers of Ark's own — there is no contrarian inversion, no subdivision, nothing pointed at the system. To ship: open cold with a claim ('You are not bad at interviews. You have never been pushed back on.'), rebuild the rules around the local-experience objection, and attach a real number from the proof bank rather than letting the prompt carry the whole post.