Loading…
Views
11,300
Likes
313
Comments
6
Shares
47
Duration
94s
VPF 0.8898
Caption
Resume before and after example to avoid ageism and age bias triggers in the job search. You can also access the exact resume templates I use with step by step instructions and examples for each section or you can have me write your resume for you. Details are available from the link in my profile. #resumetips #resumehelp #resumetemplate #ageism #jobhunting
Transcript
This is a resume for someone over 40 years old applying for a senior role, and so is this one, but this includes common mistakes that can lead to age bias. While this is ageism proof, same person, same experience. One gets ignored, one gets you hired. And I'm gonna show you the three reasons why. Keep in mind this isn't about hiding your age, it's about avoiding the mistakes people think make them look more qualified but actually trigger age bias. So the first thing is right at the top of the summary. There are two common mistakes here in this before version. The first is mentioning years of experience, and then the second is the length of the summary. It's just too long. What you wanna do is remove the years, replace it with something like extensive, and then just condense the summary to like two to three sentences. Like in this after version, you wanna keep the details in the actual work experience section. The second thing is the number of jobs listed, and this one quietly works against a lot of people. This before version makes the mistake of listing five roles with some that go back over 15 years. In my ages improved resume templates, I recommend minimising or removing older roles and then expanding on the last 10 years or so. Like in this after version, recruiters and hiring managers are only reading resumes for a few seconds initially, and this gives them exactly What they're looking for quickly. As a side note, you wanna make sure that you're always covering your level. Like how senior your role was, how big your role was, like your scope, and what results you delivered. The third thing is this before version lists key achievements separately. And this is something where people think it makes them look stronger. Don't get me wrong, you absolutely need to have your achievements. But separating them creates more work for the person reviewing your resume, because now they have to connect the dots and figure out which achievement ties to which role. And if anything's unclear or confusing, they're just gonna move on to the next person.
Hook analysis
brand_fit: with_changes“This is a resume for someone over 40 years old applying for a senior role, and so is this one, but this includes common mistakes that can lead to age bias.”
Pattern
contrarian_inversion
Format
screen_walkthrough
Topic
resume-not-working
Sub-topic
age bias resume before and after
Content angle
the things you add to look more qualified are what get you filtered out
CTA
Get the resume templates or have her write your resume — link in profile
Narrative structure
same-person before/after comparison -> three named fixes, each with the mistake then the correction
AU transplant
yes
Transplant note
Everything structural carries: identical-candidate A/B resume, 'one gets ignored, one gets you hired', then three concrete edits. The three mechanisms (drop the year count from the summary and cut it to two or three sentences, compress roles older than ten years, fold achievements under the role they belong to instead of a separate block) are format conventions that hold in Australia. For Ark the swap is the axis of bias: instead of 'over 40', run it as the overseas-trained candidate whose resume is being read for a few seconds by an Australian recruiter — same before/after, same three fixes, plus Australian conventions the US-style resume misses. No US-specific claims in the transcript to strip.
Brand fit note
Usable shape with a real mechanism, which passes the 'mechanism, not encouragement' check, and the pre-empt ('this isn't about hiding your age') keeps it clear of the never-ship on lying — removing a year count is omission, which fits 'tell the truth in the most commercially compelling order'. Changes needed: the subject is ageism, not internationally-trained professionals, so it has no Australian specificity and a US coach could publish it unchanged; there are zero numbers of the cost-accounting kind ('a few seconds', 'over 15 years' are vague — Ark would need $ figures, placement counts, callback counts); the hedged coach register ('don't get me wrong', 'like', 'you absolutely need to') would all get cut for 8-14 word declaratives; and the CTA sells the competitor's own templates, so it must be replaced.